top of page

We’ll Represent You Later: Adventures in Chasing Dollars Over Dues

Updated: Mar 13


Board on Guard:

How Directors Must Prevent Mission Drift and Protect Member Interests


In membership-based organisation's—such as unions, trade associations, and other peak bodies—the source of funding can dramatically shape day-to-day operations and long-term priorities. When external grants, government seed funding, or corporate sponsorships begin to dwarf membership dues, a dangerous misalignment can arise. Instead of focusing on the collective needs of its members, the organisation may find itself catering to the demands of external financiers. This phenomenon is often referred to as a “principal–agent problem,” where the agent (management) chases funding that secures its own survival, possibly at odds with the principals (members).


At the helm, however, stands the Board of Directors—charged with safeguarding the organisation’s mission, ensuring that no influx of external resources derails the core purpose. Below, we examine how this misalignment develops, provide a cautionary example, and spotlight why an alert, proactive Board is essential to keeping the organisation on track.


When External Dollars Eclipse Member Interests


For many peak bodies, membership dues have historically been the bedrock of revenue and accountability. Yet, in modern practice, reliance on government grants, sponsorships, and project funding can quickly overshadow these dues—shifting the organisation’s focus away from grassroots concerns. When 70–80% of the budget originates from external sources, leaders face an inherent tension:

  • Honor the membership’s agenda, or

  • Preserve the dominant funding streams that pay the salaries and support organisational growth.


As this imbalance grows, so does the risk that managers or executives become more attentive to the demands of funders—whose goals or values may not always align with those of the membership. Over time, members might sense their interests are being sidestepped or diluted.


A Real-World Case: Seed Funding and the Three-Year Crunch


Consider a newly formed Peak Body set up to represent a niche Australian industry. The government provides seed funding that fully covers operational costs for three years, dwarfing the limited dues that come from a relatively small membership base. During this three-year window, the Peak Body’s annual budget is nearly 100% reliant on the seed grant.


As year four approaches and the funding dries up, the Peak Body needs a new plan—fast.


Management might pursue:

  • Additional government grants, potentially with conditions that reshape advocacy.

  • Corporate sponsorships, which might conflict with certain member interests if sponsors are also industry players.

  • Fee-for-service or consultancy projects, which risk sapping resources away from member-focused initiatives.


At this pivotal point, the question emerges: who will the Peak Body serve—its membership or external funders? That is precisely where a diligent Board steps in.


Board on Guard: Countering Mission Drift


1. Anchoring the Mission

A strong Board uses the organisation’s foundational mission as a decision-making touchstone. When confronted with large grants or sponsorship deals, directors should ask:

  • “Does this funding directly support member needs and our stated purpose?”

  • “Might accepting this funding compromise our ability to advocate on certain issues important to members?”


By insisting on alignment with the organisation’s core objectives, the Board helps minimise the risk of mission drift.


2. Holding Management Accountable

The Board typically hires the Chief Executive Officer and senior leadership team. If these executives start prioritising funders’ demands over members’ interests, the Board can intervene—through performance reviews, action plans, or, in extreme cases, leadership changes. This level of oversight reinforces that members’ voices remain paramount.


3. Ensuring Financial Transparency

In scenarios where membership fees cover only 20–30% of total revenue, the Board must vigilantly scrutinise budgets and spending. Directors can require detailed explanations for each major expense or partnership—especially those funded externally—and evaluate whether these expenditures deliver demonstrable benefits to members.


4. Maintaining Strong Member Engagement

An informed, engaged membership is key to holding the Board (and, by extension, management) accountable. A Board composed largely of industry insiders has the advantage of real-world expertise, but must also cultivate two-way communication channels:

  • Regular surveys or consultations with members.

  • Open forums or annual meetings where directors and management can be questioned directly.

  • Clear, accessible reporting on the outcomes of major projects or policy initiatives.


When members stay informed, they are more likely to spot potential mission drift early and rally the Board to course-correct.


Striking a Sustainable Balance


External funding does have its benefits: it can expand services, support new initiatives, and finance research that might be impossible with membership dues alone. The challenge is to leverage these resources without sacrificing the very purpose for which the Peak Body or union was formed. Well-drafted agreements with external funders, explicit ethical sponsorship guidelines, and clearly documented goals can all help steer the organisation in a member-centric direction.


Ultimately, the Board of Directors stands as the linchpin in safeguarding mission fidelity. By championing accountability, transparency, and strategic alignment, directors shield the membership from the unintended consequences of over-reliance on external funding. In doing so, they fulfil their fundamental duty: keeping the organisation true to its core mission—even in the face of shifting financial realities.


THE BOARD MUST STEP UP


When funding sources become misaligned with membership interests, a Board on guard is the most effective defence. Directors who are committed to transparent governance and member engagement can prevent mission drift, ensuring the Peak Body remains an authentic advocate for those who matter most—its members.


_________________________________________________________________________________


If you are enjoying these articles, please share on social media, remember to follow our Facebook page here and if you join the website, you will receive an email every time a new post is published.

Thank you for taking the time to read.

 
 
 

1 commentaire


admin
10 mars

In Australia, the connection to the rest of the worlds' agreements has clearly become linked to the major environmental organisations who have infiltrated our Advisory bodies both at National and State level.

Australian policies along with the push for a 'republic' in this country, the creation of 'incorporating' our state agencies, challenging the commonwealth ' Constitution' may not seem relevant here however in my experiencing these events are impacting the decisions of boards both at state and National level.

Example our Commercial Fishing Industry has been 'hammered' for more than thirty years with the 'sustainable, environmental demands of major world environmental organisations that are also receiving funding from the government. Australia's commercial fisheries are some of the best managed i…

J'aime
bottom of page