The Death of Generational Occupations
- Joshua Van Der Neut

- Oct 3, 2025
- 3 min read

For centuries, some industries were not just jobs, they were lifelines passed from parent to child, anchoring families, communities, and cultures. Fishing, farming, mining, forestry, and trade crafts like shipbuilding or stonemasonry thrived because knowledge and passion were transferred down the line. These were not careers people stumbled into, they were vocations they inherited.
A father taught his son how to read the tide or mend a net. A mother showed her daughter how to coax crops from stubborn soil. Skills were embedded into daily life, reinforced through repetition, and wrapped in pride. Generational industries were living testaments to continuity, evidence that survival and prosperity were tied to stewardship and succession.
That chain is now breaking. Across Australia, and much of the world, the very parents who once nurtured successors are quietly steering their children away. Where passion once lit the torch, fatigue, bureaucracy, and despair now snuff it out. In commercial fishing, families who once prided themselves on keeping the fleet alive are urging their children into office jobs, apprenticeships, or university degrees. Farmers who fed towns through droughts and floods encourage their kids to find something easier, safer, or more stable. In forestry towns, in shearing sheds, in small scale mines, the same story repeats. The link between one generation and the next frays a little more each year. It is not because the work lost its meaning, it is because the system around it did.
In my own family, the tension was visible. My brother always wanted to become a fisherman, but my dad refused. He told him to get a trade instead. My brother tried plumbing and, when that did not stick, applied for a telemarketing job. That was the moment my dad said, if that is your pursuit you may as well come be a fisherman. That is how my brother’s journey began. My own path was different. I spent my mid thirties in an office, ticking all the boxes of success but feeling my work had no purpose. As my dad neared retirement, I took a career break to hop on the boat and learn the craft while he still had the energy to teach. Barely a day passes without Dad asking, are you sure you want to be a fisherman. His question hangs in the wheelhouse like the smell of diesel and salt, a mix of pride and warning. Our story is not unusual. It is a microcosm of what is happening across countless family industries.
Generational industries now face an unprecedented convergence of pressures. Regulation without reciprocity erodes confidence. Global competition sees imported food and fibre, often produced with little regard for environmental or labour standards, undercut local producers. Rising costs of fuel, gear, insurance and compliance eat into margins while returns stagnate. Fishermen, farmers, and miners are increasingly painted as villains in environmental debates, leaving younger generations disillusioned about following in their parents’ footsteps. When external pressures outpace rewards, passion curdles into resentment. Parents, seeing no fair fight left, no longer want their children chained to the same battles.
What is being lost is not just economic opportunity but cultural continuity. Fishing families once carried stories of tides and seasons. Farmers knew their land in ways no satellite could capture. Boatbuilders passed down tricks learned from grandfathers who had learned them from their own. Generational knowledge is a kind of wisdom, subtle, situational, and often invisible, that no manual or training course can fully replace. When these occupations die as generational pursuits, they do not just shrink economically, they unravel socially. Communities fracture. Young people scatter. Local identity weakens. Nations lose resilience by becoming dependent on imports for food, fibre, and resources once proudly supplied at home.
If generational industries are to survive, they need more than nostalgia. They need systems that support renewal. Policies must be shaped with families, not imposed on them. Sustainability must be recognised as not only about ecosystems but also about the survival of the people who manage them. Domestic producers must be valued over cheap imports. Real succession programs should be funded so that skills and licences pass between generations rather than vanish with retirements. Dignity and pride need to be restored in occupations that built nations. Parents will only start passing down the torch again when they believe their children can thrive, not just survive, in the industries they once loved.
Until then, the death of generational occupations will continue, and with it, the slow hollowing out of industries that once defined who we are.




Comments